[email protected] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > Any objections to dropping all HAVE_CONFIG_H uses in InetUtils? > > That is fine.
I'll take a stab at it. > Marking strings has to be done manually and carefully to make sure > we translate useful strings. It would quite an effort to resolve > this in one go, however we can start on this and add strings as we > move along. > > Any objections to creating a gettext domain for InetUtils and start > marking strings for translation? > > The major problem is that many of the strings are hard to translate (I > think I once removed a bunch of _() calls to clean things up). I > would prefer, for now, to just add this check to the list of > syntax-checks to be ignored. Atleast, until we release. I'm fine with delaying this until after the release. I agree the state of the current strings are poor even for English, so part of the translation markup will be to go through it -- that's what I referred to above. /Simon
