Hello again,

onsdag den  8 oktober 2014 klockan 09:41 skrev Mats Erik Andersson detta:
> fredag den  3 oktober 2014 klockan 19:51 skrev Guillem Jover detta:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I just stumbled over this on <http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/79>,
> > and from a cursory glance it appears as if inetutils' syslogd is also
> > vulnerable? There's a patch there that seems would apply w/o much
> > effort.
> 
> I have begun an analysis, in fact I intended to perform a review
> already earlier since there seemed to be another obscurity related
> to facility decoding.

The very needed changes have just been pushed, they resist threats as
reported in the referenced CVE-2014-3634 and add test cases to demon-
strate that kinf of capability.

Regards,
  Mats E A

Reply via email to