Hi Simon, Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities <bug-inetutils@gnu.org> writes:
> - Push a topic branch to my personal inetutils fork: > https://codeberg.org/jas/inetutils > - Push the topic branch to a GitLab project to run CI/CD: > https://gitlab.com/gsasl/inetutils/-/pipelines > it uses this CI/CD configuration file that you can use too: > https://gitlab.com/gnulib/pipeline/-/raw/main/gnu/inetutils.yml > - Once CI/CD is happy, open a pull request to merge things > into https://codeberg.org/inetutils/inetutils > - Check that savannah master is in sync with codeberg master, > and resolve any conflicts. > - Accept the merge request. Right now I've used the website but simply > merging it locally using 'git' and pushing to codeberg's master should > work fine. There is no need to use the website. > - Pull the new codeberg master locally and push to savannah. Thank you for working all of this. I have submitted a simple one line pull request for you [1]. :) > I reviewed all documentation in the git repository, and the only thing > referring to Savannah that I could find was README-alpha that has: > > git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/inetutils.git > > That information still work (if savannah is online...), and I don't see > any need to change this right now. People on the list know about > https://codeberg.org/inetutils/inetutils as an alternative now. Yep, no need to mention it now. If everything works well then we can add a note later. > I reviewed changes in master compared to the last v2.6 release and they > are really minimal, so doing a v2.7 now seems premature... Agreed. Collin [1] https://codeberg.org/inetutils/inetutils/pulls/4
