On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 07:46:07AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> telnet is extremely old and just because there is still widespread use of 
> telnet or the daemon, doesn't provide a valid reason to keep using it. these 
> trivial vulnerabilities keep popping up and if you still insist of using 
> telnet, you deserve getting pwned

I mostly let these messages through so far (rejecting only one, which
had even less value), but as a moderator I declare end of sub-thread
now.  Further messages on "Who uses telnet anyway?" will be rejected by
default, unless they truly add something new.

Messages on actual security issues/fixes in telnet are still desirable.

Alexander

P.S. I first wrote the above in a confusing manner, not clarifying it's
only end of sub-thread started by kf503bla, not the entire thread.
Corrected now, and I'll only let this corrected message to oss-security.

        • ... Erik Auerswald
        • ... Justin Swartz
          • ... Ron Ben Yizhak
          • ... Solar Designer
            • ... Solar Designer
          • ... kf503bla
          • ... Solar Designer
            • ... Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
              • ... kf503bla
              • ... Solar Designer
              • ... Solar Designer
              • ... Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
            • ... Eddie Chapman
              • ... Justin Swartz
              • ... Eddie Chapman
          • ... clumsy
  • Re: Telnetd... Erik Auerswald
    • Re: Te... Ron Ben Yizhak
      • Re... Ron Ben Yizhak
        • ... Erik Auerswald
          • ... Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities

Reply via email to