Hi!

[ I'm not a maintainer, so I'll leave parts of the questions for them. ]

On Thu, 2026-03-12 at 08:51:31 +0000, Adiel Sol wrote:
> A couple of questions about disclosure:
> 
>   1.  Are you planning to request a CVE for this issue (e.g. through
>       the GNU project or another CNA), or would you prefer that we
>       request it from our side?

Getting one assigned (from whoever) would be great for tracking
purposes (talking from Debian's PoV). I'm not sure what's the usual
process here though.

>   3. What is your preferred process from here until public
>      disclosure (e.g. embargo period, coordinated advisory, or
>      anything we should avoid doing until a certain date)?

I'm afraid this is already public by way of the initial mail hitting
the publicly archived mailing list and the PR:

  https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-inetutils/2026-03/msg00031.html
  https://codeberg.org/inetutils/inetutils/pulls/17

I'm wondering whether the contact address might mislead reporters into
thinking this is a private contact instead of a public mailing list
(because it does not have "lists" anywhere in its name)? And perhaps
that might need to be clarified in the documentation?

Thanks,
Guillem

  • Re: Remote ... Collin Funk
    • Re: Re... Adiel Sol
      • Re... Guillem Jover
      • Re... Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities
        • ... Adiel Sol
          • ... Simon Josefsson via Bug reports for the GNU Internet utilities

Reply via email to