Feedback for "JavaScript License Web Labels": I wonder whether it is allowed to link to the webpage containing the table with the 'link' element instead of the 'a' element? If not, I'd like to propose it hereby.
The example from <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/javascript-labels.html> (using 'a') is: > <a href="/about/javascript" rel="jslicense">[…]</a> Using 'link' it could look like this: > <link href="/about/javascript" rel="jslicense" title="[…]" /> Why? To "hide" the link. I understand that it is desirable to inform the visitor about the JS licensing, but I fear that requiring 'a' makes it harder or even impossible to use JavaScript License Web Labels in some contexts. My primary concern is the adoption by CMS. When a CMS ships with JavaScript and wants to use JavaScript License Web Labels, it could be very hard to succeed in ensuring that the CMS administrator/themer (who maybe never heard of JavaScript) does not remove the link (intentionally or accidentally). A 'link' element could be inserted automatically, independent of the chosen theme. What do you think?
