>
> On 08/03/2017 05:30 PM, Nathan Nichols wrote:
> >
> * So you are saying I should submit changes to here and just attach the*>
> * changed source files?* Nathan -
> regarding the bug tracker - yes - but not to post entire files - what
> you would need to do is create a patch file using `git diff` like:
> git diff upstream/master your-branch > todays.patch
> then attach the todays.patch file to an issue on the bug tracker -
> ideally the same issue you already have open about this feature and not
> a new issue every day
> personally, i would still put my fork on another server and link to it
> in on tracker issue for the benefit of anyone who finds this workflow
> insane
> ---
> Thomas -
> yes i understand the libreJS project is bound by these tools that GNU
> provides - to get around this limitation the libreJS project would need
> to start accepting contributions on another git host - this is more a
> criticism of savannah and not the libreJS project but you guys should
> realize that the savannah infrastructure itself is a hinderance to all
> projects it hosts with respect to weloming newcomers without neck-beards
> as for a feature request for better git workflow support - im quite sure
> that this is common knowlegde - there has been discussion for several
> years about upgrading savannah to the modern fusionforge or re-writing
> altogether but this has not happened - i would hope that the savannah
> maintainers are already aware that the current system is discouraging
> new contributors by not supporting the modern workflow that they grew up
> with
> this thread as case in point that the new contributor probably has never
> heard of a .patch file - that does not mean he is not a competant
> programmer - it only means that the "patches via mailing lists" workflow
> is very outdated
> i can only assume that there is either not the will to modernize or
> there is lack of resources to do it - in either case, a feature would
> add nothing to the situation


I submitted the patch as an attachment in a bug report.

Thanks for the help


On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Nathan Nichols <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Savannah has a BTS, filling a bug report (on project, not Savannah) and
>> attach
>> a patch is the standard way.
>> nongnu simply follows GNU projects way : having maintainers. Note you can
>> enlist several keys on project.
>> Note also Project Savannah has itself a mailing list and probably relies
>> on BTS
>> where you can fill feature requests. Main keys to Savannah management are
>> disk
>> room and bandwidth (almost no fees).
>
>
> So you are saying I should submit changes to here and just attach the
> changed source files?
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=librejs
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Nathan Nichols <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Most of what is up right now in the web-ext branch is already outdated. I
>> would like to submit today's progress.
>>
>> How do I go about doing this?
>>
>
>

Reply via email to