This is not a bug, but a suggestion for a better UX. In the function forceNoscriptElements(doc) of main_background.js, the query selector should be *noscript:not([data-librejs-display])* instead of *noscript:not([data-librejs-nodisplay])*.
First, there is no documentation available to inform web developer of the existence of *data-librejs-nodisplay*. (I had to read the file main_background.js to find it.) Second, this is bad programming to alter what was programmed by the web developer. If the javascript version is acceptable, there are no reasons to prefer the non-script version, quite the opposite. The non-script version is not necessarily equivalent to the javascript version (otherwise why create a javascript version?). µBlock does force noscript refresh, but only when the javascript is disabled (which is logic). NoScript does force noscript refresh all the time, which is wrong. If you do force a noscript refresh, it should be done only if you reject some of the javascript and if the web developer allowed it ( *data-librejs-display*). Otherwise, you can assume the web developer prefer showing the web page with the partially loaded javascript. Of course, if all javascript is disabled, you might want to redirect to the non-script version (like µBlock does). In any case, when all javascript is good, never redirect to the non-script version.
