Hi Michel Le Bihan Would you like to write a draft of the standard? Just a copy of the librejs documentation about it would probably work well as a starting point.
Then we can proofread and send to someone who can make it a standard. Would that be the W3C or who do you think would be the best organization? -- Svetlana Tkachenko, Associate Member of the Free Software Foundation http://www.wikimedia.org http://www.fsf.org http://www.gnu.org Michel Le Bihan via <[email protected]> написал(а): > Hello, > > I think that JavaScript developers are becoming aware of the issue and > are adding licensing info in comments in there JS code. Many popular JS > frameworks and libs have license info, but not in a standard format. > Examples: > https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/vue > https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lightbox2/2.11.1/js/lightbox.min.js > https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.5.1.slim.js (missing from the minified > JS) > https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/dist/umd/popper.min.js > https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.5.2/js/bootstrap.min.js > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/philipwalton/polyfill/master/dist/polyfill.min.js > Even https://apis.google.com/js/api.js has license info. > > `Released under the MIT license` seems to be a popular string. I think > that if a standard was introduce it, developers would adopt it. That > would allow LibreJS to better detect license info and would make many > sites usable with LibreJS. > > Michel Le Bihan > > >
