On Wednesday 20 April 2005 18:45, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hi Gideon, > > Please keep the mailing list in Cc, so others can help (or see whether > their problems are the same as yours), unless you send really huge > files. Thank you. > > * Gideon Go wrote on Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:23:07PM CEST: > > On Wednesday 20 April 2005 10:17, you wrote: > > > * Gideon Go wrote on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 02:11:32AM CEST: > > *snip* > > > > > I followed all directions as stated in "libtool.info:Distributing > > > > libltdl" about what to include in configure.in: > > > > AC_LIBLTDL_CONVENIENCE > > > > AC_SUBST(LTDLINCL) > > > > AC_SUBST(LIBLTDL) > > > > AC_LIBTOOL_DLOPEN > > > > AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > > > > AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(libltdl) > > *snip* > > > > > I got: > > > > ... > > > > libltdl/Makefile.am:5: INSTALL_LTDL does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL > > > > libltdl/Makefile.am:12: CONVENIENCE_LTDL does not appear in > > > > AM_CONDITIONAL ... > > > > autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 > > > > Then I tried 4 different ways to build the testpackage "autotest.tar.bz2" > > which really is my package without any source code ;) > > That's fine. I think it also gave me the necessary clue: in toplevel > > configure.ac you have: > | AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile > | libltdl/Makefile > | src/Makefile]) > > Please remove libltdl/Makefile. Explanation: AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS(libltdl) > means there is a sub-configuration in libltdl, with associated > configure.ac and created configure. That libltdl/configure.ac already > has libltdl/Makefile as output. > > Does everything work fine for you now? > Is there an error in our documentation that suggests doing this?
Yes! Everything works fine now. The libltdl/Makefile ended up here because it is included when I executed autoscan. It does seem reasonable, so I left it there and forgot about it. Thanks again! Regards, Gideon _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
