sorry for the self-followup. * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:30:57PM CEST: > * Joe Buck wrote on Mon, May 02, 2005 at 08:01:49PM CEST: > > > > We really need something done about this problem, as it interferes > > with our ability to efficiently develop GCC. > > How many objects does libjava contain? Rather 100 or 1000? Do you > need relinking because of command line length?
I am compiling libjava ATM to see what happens. > > From: Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Now, unless I've done something drastically wrong, it appears as if we > > are spending 2/3 of our time in the libtool script. > > I know. I worked on that for Libtool HEAD and fixed it mostly (that is, s/it/linking/ Sorry for that. Compilation needs something like libtool-cache, if it is a bottleneck. BTW, choosing the right shell may also help a lot. Adapting Libtool to do this better for cases of interest might be a cheap way to get more speed quickly. > for all decent platforms, not win32), for the case of many objects. Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
