> If you produce a (also non-gcc) tested patch, ok. This change seems > rather benign.
I think I'm gonna drop this one, for two reasons. There are other equally un-severe warnings that are probably much harder to get rid of, and the code in question doesn't exist in libtool 1.9 or cvs. Cheers, Stefaan _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
