Hi Peter, * Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 11:47:31AM CEST: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >* Peter Breitenlohner wrote on Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 05:05:43PM CEST: > >> > >>When building packages using libtool there frequently are (lots of) > >>warnings such as (edited to avoid overlong lines):
> >The problem with fixing this is that the warning is trivial albeit a bit > >runtime-expensive to fix, ........... > > > >......... So no, I don't think it is > >a good idea to apply this patch. > OK, I see. In the case I mentioned above, I'm almost certain the > non-canonical paths originate from gcc (gcc --print-xxx). > > Maybe gcc could be taught not to produce these (but who is going to > convince the gcc people?). Not the only solution either. I'd like to support relocatable installs (e.g., Solaris $ORIGIN support) and similar; however, I simply don't know yet how that can be achieved without falling into all kinds of subtle traps. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
