* Vincent Lefevre wrote on Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:22:35AM CEST:
> On 2007-07-02 22:40:37 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Thanks for your feedback.  Does this patch work for you?
> 
> Yes, it solves the problem. Thanks.

Thanks to both of you.  Applied.  

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:59:14AM CEST:
> On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 22:40 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > 
> > OK to apply to both branches?  Or do you think I should hack in
> > $reload_cmds, or do a full link (I fear a situation where we may have to
> > add some extra libraries for some obscure setup)?
> 
> Yes, please commit. I don't think we have to worry about this too much,
> the ld is old and patches are available for it.

Well I worried that, say, the test would inadvertently fail on Solaris
12 when that exists, just to accommodate this old system.

Cheers,
Ralf


_______________________________________________
Bug-libtool mailing list
Bug-libtool@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool

Reply via email to