* Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:26:16PM CET: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > * Mike Frysinger wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:38:05AM CET: > > > the argz.m4 header checks to see if error_t is defined, but only does so > > > by including the argz.h header. if you try to build on a system that > > > does provide error_t, but not argz.h, the argz replacement module fails > > > to build. on glibc systems, error_t is defined in errno.h. perhaps the > > > gl_FUNC_ARGZ should be checking to see if errno.h exists and if so, > > > including it. > > > > I don't quite understand. If gl_FUNC_ARGZ finds that error_t is not > > defined, it defines __error_t_defined in addition to error_t. > > this must be a semi-recent addition then ... the package i'm looking at does > not do that ... here is the snippet from naim: > # AC_LTDL_FUNC_ARGZ
The current gnulib module is newer, please try that. The macro has also been renamed to gl_FUNC_ARGZ for gnulib consistency. > > This should keep your errno.h header from defining error_t. > > shouldnt errno.h also be checked for the error_t type since that is where it > actually gets defined ? Do you know of a system that has error_t that doesn't use __error_t_defined? Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
