Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Nelson, Peter, > > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:18:42AM CET: >> Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote: >> >>> libtool: compile: gcj -g -O2 -c A3.java >>> gcj: libgcj.spec: No such file or directory > >> Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain on any of >> your systems? > > First off, let us thank Nelson for doing all this testing work for us. > Thank you!
Yes, thank you Nelson. > > Then, let's avoid us getting blame for broken gcj installations. > OK to apply this patch to avoid the gcj test when a compile would fail? > Or do you feel tests for working compilers should be done in configure > already? > I think the test for a working GCJ should be in libtool, and unset GCJ, avoid adding the tag etc.if it is found to be nonfunctional. We would have to issue a warning during configure or something. Does not look to be quite as easy as this patch though, if you want to apply this one as a stop-gap measure, that is fine. > Cheers, > Ralf > > 2008-03-06 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * tests/convenience.at (Java convenience archives): Skip test if > gcj cannot compile a .java file. > Report by Nelson H. F. Beebe. Peter -- Peter O'Gorman http://pogma.com _______________________________________________ Bug-libtool mailing list Bug-libtool@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-libtool
