On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 21:01, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > I think you have old fonts lying around somewhere. (The pfas > > > are new, and are used if you do ly2dvi -p , maybe it's that?) > > > > I wondered about that myself. I just tried buildscripts/clean-fonts.sh > > and then ran the file with ly2dvi -P from within Emacs. It was fine. > > Then I ran the LaTeX wrapper file through lilypond-book. Some fonts > > were generated: > > > > vaticana > > mensural > > neo_mensural > > parmesan > > > > And the output was as I described before. It is quite reproducible > > here. > > Can't reproduce. I am quite sure that there are old files hiding > somewhere. > Maybe you can find them using "locate feta".
Yeah, screenloads of them. Which ones do I need to scrap? If I run clean-fonts.sh I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lilypond]# ./buildscripts/clean-fonts.sh removing /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/lilypond/feta16.tfm /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/lilypond/feta20.tfm /usr/share/texmf/fonts/tfm/lilypond/parmesan20.tfm /usr/share/texmf/fonts/pk/ljfour/lilypond/feta16.600pk /usr/share/texmf/fonts/pk/ljfour/lilypond/feta20.600pk /usr/share/texmf/fonts/pk/ljfour/lilypond/parmesan20.600pk If I run lilypond-book again I would expect to repeat what happened the last time. -David _______________________________________________ Bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
