[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The values for break-visibility do not seem to be documented, or
> at least, not all in one place. Here are two ways to list them.
> Choose one, or try to think of a better way.
>
> BTW, in order to get the change to scm/define-grob-properties.scm into the
> manual, I had to do "make clean; make; make web", which takes a long time.
> Any chance of improving the dependancies? OTOH, not many users will be
make clean is not necessary.
>
> ~ John Williams
>
> --- lily/item.cc 2004/01/11 18:58:05 1.1
> +++ lily/item.cc 2004/01/11 23:35:09
> @@ -212,5 +212,18 @@
> "the outcome of the @code{break-visibility}. This grob property is a\n"
> "function taking a direction (-1, 0 or 1) as argument. It returns a\n"
> "cons of booleans, signifying whether this grob should be transparent\n"
> - "and have no extent.\n",
> + "and have no extent.\n"
> + "\n"
> + "The following symbols for break-visibility are predefined for you:\n"
This is confusing. I would call them variables iso. symbols.
Also "for you" is superfluous.
I've put your patch, with some changes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
