On Sunday 02 May 2004 16.16, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > BTW, the same goes for multivoice-rest-position2. It's not 100% > > obvious (to me at least) that it really is a bug; I can imagine that > > the coders could be more motivated to fix the problem if you've done > > some research that shows that your suggestion is common practise. > > It's quite difficult to find a real example quickly (except my own > work :-). Well, take `Das Wohltemperierte Klavier, Teil I' (Henle 14, > engraved 1950 I think) and look at Fuga XVIII (BWV 863). In bar 4, > the eighth rests in the left hand are lower than in bar 39 or 40. > Similar typesetting can be found in Fuga XX. The general idea is that > rests of a voice in a multi-voice staff should follow the melody. > > An even better example is from Robert Schumann, Klavierwerke IV > (Breitkopf 2620, engraved at least before 130 years), Humoreske, page > 24f (`Mit einigem Pomp'), left hand -- I'm quite sure that this must > look similar in all other editions of the Humoreske. Again, the idea > is that the rests roughly follow the voice's vertical position.
Great! > PS: I don't have a scanner (yet), so I can't provide images. Not needed IMO, the important thing is that there _exists_ a good source. I added notes that your two bug reports are verified as The Way It Should Be Done In Well-Engraved Scores. It makes an important difference in priority, compared to people who simply complain that they think something doesn't look good. Erik _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
