On Sunday 13 June 2004 21.35, Erik Sandberg wrote: > On Sunday 13 June 2004 12.31, Alex Klein wrote: > > Hi guys, > > first of all, great job on lilypond. I first tried it about two months > > ago and now I'm using it for pretty much all of my notation stuff. I'm > > currently using 2.0.3 which came with the recent Suse 9.1, but there are > > some improvements in 2.3.3 which make me think about switching to it > > (for example the Rehearsal marks do no longer collide with the bar > > numbers). But I have one main problem: > > > > The titling in 2.3.3 does not seem to work correct. If I use > > 2.3.3 is not yet stable enough for everyday use. (and titling has been > completely rewritten). I'd recommend you to use 2.2 for now.
I take back this statement. From 2.3.4 you should be able to use lilypond, if you are adventurous. I'll add your bug to the bug database soon. Erik _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
