[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
> >> \score {
> >> }
> >>
> >> \score {
> >> }
> >
> > this is an area where it's not clear to me
> > how to maintain backward compatibility with 2.2. The 2.3 solution is
> >
> > \book {
> > (the scores.)
> > }
>
> Assuming that, in 2.3, you never want the above without \book (unless
> you know what you are doing) maybe we should change the toplevel
> music/score handlers to group toplevel stuff into \book.
>
> Another idea would be to just emit a friendly warning about \bookn
> after the first toplevel and quit.
hmm. we're breaking lilypond.py behavior anyway,
lilypond foo.ly bar.ly
won't work anyway.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
