I have submitted a patch to CVS (both the main branch and 2.2). Still I urge you to check the text again. Especially, the paragraph preceeding the one I changed seems completely wrong to me:
"For example, the following piece contains lots of half, quarter, and 8th notes, the eighth note is followed by 1 note head width (NHW). The quarter note is followed by 2 NHW, the half by 3 NHW, etc. @lilypond[fragment,verbatim,relative=1] c2 c4. c8 c4. c8 c4. c8 c8 c8 c4 c4 c4 @end lilypond"
If I understand correctly, the widths should rather involve NHW*shortest-duration-space*spacing-increment^k, with different values of k for different durations. Right?
/Mats
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still don't think it's correct. It first says that shortest-duration-space is set to 1.2 by default and on the second line it says that the same property is set to 2.0 by default. In the actual implementation, you have (shortest-duration-space . 2.0) (spacing-increment . 1.2)
Opps. you're right. the first shortest-duration-space should be
spacing-increment. Could you apply a fix ?
BTW, I think I've seen some people (Pedro, Heikki) mention that they have fixed things in CVS. However, I haven't seen any updates scroll by when I did
cvs up
I hope everyone remembers to commit fixes to the repository once they're made locally.
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
