It should definitely not be part of the LilyPond package. One possibility is to use Werner's fix and include that in tetex-tiny.
/Mats
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
So, what will happen? I'd like to package 2.4.2 for cygwin... Should I put ec.mf into the lilypond package? Or should it be in the tetex-tiny package?
You lost me here. I thought you found that ecrm1000 should not be looked for at all?
I tried Bertalan's example file here and the dvips command with $KPATHSEA_DEBUG set to -1, it does not search for ecrm1000,
I'd gladly fix the Cygwin tetex installation, but I want to be sure to make the right fix and not add another bug.
Bertalan, what does Mats's command give you? Can you send a (comressed) log file to the list?
Jan.
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
_______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
