On Sunday 20 February 2005 18.12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Selon Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Saturday 19 February 2005 16.24, Nicolas Sceaux wrote: > > It seems that the "" in the markup is ignored (or at least, it doesn't > > affect the bounding box of the markup). If you change it to " ", it works > > as you would expect. > > > > IMHO, this hack shouldn't work in an ideal lilypond; bounding box > > calculations > > should be based on occurence of non-white pixels. Why don't you use > > padding instead? > > Thank you for your answer. > I don't use padding because what I want is horizontal shifting. I was once > told that, unless I use the extra-offset property, I would not have to > worry about collisions. (btw, is this statement about extra-offset still > true?)
Yes, by definition extra-offset moves the objects after the collision detection process, it's just like a post-processing hack. And when it comes to collisions: there are many known bugs related to collision of text markup, so I'm afraid you always have to worry about that, more or less. Erik _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
