On Aug 17, 2005, at 1:23 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
BTW, why are you using R1*3/4*x ? Why not simply use R2.*3/4 ?
Do you mean R2.*x? The latter is some single-unit rest of unpleasant
duration, I think.
To answer your question, no reason -- strange old habit. Good as time
as any to switch over I suppose.
Best,
Will
one={ R1*3 c''1 R1*3 c''1 }
two={ R1 a'1 R1*5 a'1 }
%two={ R1 a'1 R1 R R R R a'1 }
{
\partcombine
\one
\two
}
Will Oram // Genius @ Large // AIM spamguy21
spamguy (at) foxchange (dot) com // wro1 (at) cwru (dot) edu
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
