I see. I would not expect you to do the boiling down for me,
regardless of your workload. Granted I find a way to separate the two
(they have always coexisted in my eyes) I will let you know. But
please be clearer in the future.
Will
On Oct 25, 2006, at 7.16 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Will Oram wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 6.38 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Unfortunately I'm very busy at the moment. Could you create a
minimal example which demonstrates this? We need a minimal
example before it can be added to the bug database, and I cannot
construct one at the moment.
I did. It was in the e-mail you replied to.
There were at least a dozen lines in that example. The
simultaneous key change quirk can probably be expressed in five
lines. I'm not certain about the tuplet bracket, but I would bet
that it could be expressed in a monophonic score with less than 10
lines of code.
I'm sorry for being a prig about this, but somebody needs to do
this. I do not have the time in the next few weeks, and I'm
certain that Han-Wen does not have the time. So either you do it,
or it doesn't get done.
- Graham
focus on the wherefore
for in it lies the question
----------------------------------------------------------
_ | WILL ORAM
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) | spamguy (at) foxchange . com
- against HTML email X | wro1 (at) cwru . edu
& vCards / \ |
| AIM spamguy21
----------------------------------------------------------
(ABOVE: Magnetic poetry #4)
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
