Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nicolas Sceaux escreveu: >> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> But I would be grateful for a short look at >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=162 >> >> Ok, I'll look at it soon. > > Hmm, > > I think this introduces another problem. Can you have look again > at > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=162
> Yes, but this introduces a new problem. Putting stuff into lily module > from a .ly file means that definitions from one .ly file will leak > into another, which is also a problem. I don't understand: what leaks into what? > I think the better solution is to define all markup commands in the > .ly file, eg. by defining them in .scm and importing those definitions > in markup-init.ly You mean, making all markup commands defined in a .ly file module (instead of in the (lily) module), including markups defined later, in other files? I don't see how this solves the problem that I have not understood :) nicolas _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
