Maximilian Albert escreveu: > Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb: > >> actually, I prefer a change in convertrules.py >> > > Something like this? You probably have added this yourself already, but > just in case ... (I hope I didn't get anything wrong with the python > syntax). > > Interesting, though, that you like it better this way. I thought it > might cause some confusion later on or in users unfamiliar with the new > method of setting the style if there is only one exception to the > otherwise consistent naming convention for the alists. >
Hmm, which convention do you refer to? alteration-default-glyph-name-alist is more like Grob-type-Name-Scheme-Type (which is standard), but standard-alteration-glyph-name-alist reads more like English. What do you think. (I'm not sure what I was thinking when I entered the stuff.) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
