Sounds good. You have to be careful that the postponed category doesn't become a dumping ground though. a
2007/3/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
About six months ago, there was discussion about a priority level below "low"; at the time I argued against it. I've now changed my mind and added a "Priority-Postponed" tag. Here's my interpretation of the bug priorities: High, Regression: fix within one or two releases Medium: fix before next big Low: might be fixed in one or two stable releases Postponed: fix would be difficult without major restructuring of the lilypond internals, and/or there is no developer actively working in this area. IMO, all ancient notation bugs qualify for this, as do esoteric collision bugs. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
