Now I see! There is a difference between
\unfoldRepeats {\repeat tremolo 4 c8 } % Works correctly
and
\unfoldRepeats {\repeat tremolo 4 { c8 } } % Gives 16th notes!!!
As long as we don't use \unfoldRepeats, both syntax forms provide the same
output.
In version 2.8 and earlier, we used to have warning message
"warning: expect 2 elements for chord tremolo, found 1"
but it seems that this warning was removed in the revision
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=blobdiff;f=lily/chord-tremolo-engraver.cc;h=60800064c91ae4dd91b60b35827377fbbafc4694;hp=dd1c040946f78a315f2ddc8bd357770ee567221c;hb=7c578820eb536c7ff135c351932e418f5bda1c80;hpb=db735aad5ee3f02cb82f32d8b314f1bcb7ec91ff
Still, the function unfold-repeats in scm/music-functions.scm only
checks if the
argument is a SequentialMusic or an EventChord, which is too simplistic if
the ordinary engraver doesn't distinguish between the two cases.
/Mats
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2007/4/3, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
If you want a single note with tremolo lines, then you should
use the
c1:32 syntax
whereas \repeat tremolo should be used for tremolo chords,
i.e. for constructs of the form
\repeat "tremolo" 4 { c'8 d' }
no, not completely accurate. IIRC,
\repeat "tremolo" 4 <NOTE>
is also supposed to work.
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
