Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
That's why I haven't closed 248. 247/248 are dupes, so we only need
one of them.
Since I saw "Status: invalid" on 248, I assumed that it didn't
count as a feature request. Also, 248 is focussed on a very
specific aspect, the interpretation of ties in DevNull contexts,
which has nothing to do with the alignment problems mentioned
in 247 and that I tried to clarify below.
Sorry. I simply moved your email to a "read later" folder without
actually look at it. I've reinstated 247 as an enhancement. I'll
probably do the same to 248 when do bugs again next Wed.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
