Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=517
Cheers,
- Graham
Hans Aberg wrote:
I don't think so:
In this new case, the triplets are treated as merely being time values
(2/3 notes), which do not need to fill up the whole triplet value. It is
thus possible to only have one 2/3 note standing alone, completed by
additional 2/3 notes in other positions. Then one expect the triplet
number be written over the single note, in the same style as on groups
of triplets.
Hans Åberg
On 29 Nov 2007, at 08:03, Graham Percival wrote:
Isn't this another case of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=405&q=tuplet
(although you haven't used #'brackt-visibility here, adding it doens't
help)
Cheers,
- Graham
Hans Aberg wrote:
I report this problem just for completeness. If one breaks up a
triple into to two parts, as in the following example, the triplet
number on the single note does not show. The code is
{
\time 2/8
\times 2/3 { e16 f16 } g8 \times 2/3 { a16 } |
}
It looks as in the attached GIF. (There is a beaming problem too, but
this has been reported in other bug reports.)
If one makes sure each broken triplet has more than one note, then
the triplet numbers do show. E.g.,
{
\time 4/8
\times 2/3 { e16 f16 } g8 \times 2/3 { a16 b16 } c8 \times 2/3 {
d16 e16 } |
}
Hans Åberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
