On 7 Dec 2007, at 01:25, Graham Percival wrote:
Hans, thank you for the bug reports, but please learn how to
produce minimal examples -- these allow people to understand the
bugs much more easily, which in turn lets the programmers fix it
sooner.
Added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=524
but let me show you the actual code:
\version "2.11.35"
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t}
\relative c'' {
g4 f \pitchedTrill f \startTrillSpan ges f\stopTrillSpan
}
In particular
- key signature is unnecessary, so I removed it.
- time signature is unnecessary, so I removed it.
- \times 3/4{} is completely unnecessary and confusing, so I
removed it.
When I saw your first report, I thought the problem was about
beaming. The minimal example above makes it clear that the problem
is a missing flat on the ges, and that there is no excuse for
lilypond not producing that flat.
When I made the first report, I had no idea what was causing it. All
I knew was that replacing the quadruplet with a rest made it problem
disappear, so it looked to me as though that was the problem. You,
with your broader knowledge of LilyPond bugs, could then help out,
pointing out what you thought unnecessary, so could try those
suggestions out. Only then I thought there might be an influence from
an earlier g, but to me that seems a strange thing. I have no idea of
what might cause such an influence. I am gladly to help with the
debugging of LilyPond, if you help point out what might be
simplified. If you can isolate the problem, then please report it in
way that expresses that best.
Hans Aberg
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
