Issue 546: Incorrect merging when a same note has different accidentals
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=546
Comment #2 by v.villenave:
Yes, I had initally marked it as Medium-priority... but I just found it
too horrible :)
As I told Trevor on the bug list, this looks like two side-effects of a
same bug (but
I am in no place to decide so, indeed).
Sorry for accidentally removing the \version line. It was reported on
2.11.34, and I
could reproduce it on 2.11.27.
The only point where I don't really agree with you is removing
the "collision" label.
It is typically a collision, as far as the accidentals are concerned.
But the merging
could be qualified as Defect. Oh, I'm suddenly realizing why I should
have filed two
reports... :)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
