2008/2/28 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you sure that you understand how the compound-time Scheme function > works? The last parameter should be the denominator, i.e. "8". > When you included Hans' proposed change, the denominators end up > being 2 instead of 8. If I understand Hans correctly, there should be 11 > terms > in the time signature, whereas the current definition of the Scheme > function > only gives 10 terms. So the example should rather be changed into
Oh yes, absolutely! I blindly copied Hans' line and ended up forgetting the denominator. It's a pity, however, that the number of args has to be hardcoded. Would it be possible to write some "universal" compound-meter function, where the numbers would be automatically taken into account except the last number, which would be taken as denominator? Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
