2008/5/15 Andrew Hawryluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > When a slur crosses a line break, the slur after the break begins > before the key signature. Phrasing slurs, on the other hand, begin > after the key signature. (This is not clear in any of the regression > tests because the slur examples are all in C major.)
I hadn't noticed that; I guess this is intended, but is it really the way slurs should be? > how much work would it > be to change ordinary slurs to begin after the key signature? I > believe that this would solve two bugs simultaneously: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=379 > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=427 > > and it would greatly assist me in notating vocal music, where the two > kinds of slurs are not directly interchangeable (phrasing slurs do not > cause melismas). As far as I'm concerned, I've given up using automatic melismas. Setting ignoreMelismata allows more flexibility -- and you can use both slurs and phrasing slurs without being bothered... Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
