On Sep 2, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
That has nothing to do with timing; the beginning slur should be
attached to the note before the bar check.
Indeed, it should, but it isn't because lilypond refuses to typeset
this.
(In other words, I have no idea what you're trying to tell me.)
If you remove the bar lines in this bit of code, it typesets it
perfectly. I don't see why the presence of the barlines is so
objectionable, and definitely not how it leads to an unexpected paren.
Victor.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 19:59:09 -0500
Victor Eijkhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, I don't find the barline checks here objectionable:
\score { <<
\relative c' {\time 2/4
<c e c'>2 | (<c e c'>4)
<a d f>4 | (<a d f>2)
}
}
\version "2.11.39"
but lilypond seems to think otherwise:
Parsing...
tie.ly:4:16: error: syntax error, unexpected '('
<c e c'>2 |
(<c e c'>4)
tie.ly:5:15: error: syntax error, unexpected '('
<a d f>4 |
(<a d f>2)
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
