Let's stop playing on words. The slur is part of the acciaccatura. Please take a look at the second measure in this music sheet http://imslp.org/wiki/Special:IMSLPDisclaimerAccept/24837 to see how an acciaccatura with the pitch of c sharp is suppossed to be printed.
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 17:53 +0100, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/2/14 Marc Mouries <[email protected]>: > >>> %% the acciaccatura collides with the staff > >>> > >>> \version "2.12.2" > >>> \include "english.ly" > >>> > >>> \paper{ ragged-right=##t } > >>> \relative g'' { > >>> d4 \acciaccatura cs'8 d > >>> } > >>> > >> > >> What's the collision here? Only the slur is a bit clashing with the > >> ledger line, but I'd not call this a collision. > > > > You say it is a bit clashing but you'd not call this a collision. Note that > > clash is a synonym of collision. > > Well, you're right, let's call it a collision. > > > Anyway, the bug is that the acciaccatura is badly printed. > > I disagree. If the problem is the slur, and not the acciaccatura, then > let's focus on the slur. > > > I would not > > qualify the superposition as small because the bug makes the acciaccatura > > printed on the ledger line and the slur is superposed with the ledger line. > > A note or acciaccatura with the pitch of c is suppossed to be on the > ledger line. I think the note is correctly positioned. Again, let's > focus on the slur. How would you print it? > > Otherwise, please clarify what exactly is wrong with the acciaccatura itself. > > As for the qualifying of the potential bug, I do not have that > authority or knowledge, I'm only trying to help a bit with the mailing > list. > _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
