On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:05:26AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > I think that Graham wants to draw a distinction between Frogs, whose primary > purpose is to fix bugs in the code, and documentation developers, whose > primary purpose is to improve the documentation.
Yes, absolutely! Jonathan Kulp is handling (or learning how to handle) normal doc updating tasks. I'm not certain if he signed up as a Frog; if he did, this would contribute to this confusion. If he *is* a Frog, I'd cautiously recommend that he stops being a Frog and concentrates on doc-maintenance. It's not like we don't have enough doc tasks to occupy one full-time volunteer! Granted, this may require a bit more oversight from me, and this isn't likely to happen for another two weeks... *sigh* ok, realistically not until the end of April... and even then, possibly not until June. :| I have tomorrow off, though, and should only need to spend about four hours on work emails. So I'll try to have a lilypond splurge of my own, to match Valentin's. :) > To a certain extent I created some confusion between the two, because my > initial Frog task was to have people make changes *to the code* that > affected only the documentation, rather than the program functionality. Yes, bad Carl. :P Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
