One technical problem of such a general feature, is that some MIDI
commands that are intended to apply to all MIDI tracks should be
inserted in track 0, whereas other MIDI commands (that contain a channel
number) should be inserted in the same track as the corresponding music.
Another complication (at least conceptually) is the different concepts
used in LilyPond and MIDI and how they are mapped to each other. By
default, MIDI channels correspond to Staff contexts in LilyPond, but
this can be changed by redefining the context definitions in LilyPond. A
final complication is the lack of standardization of MIDI.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2003-10/msg00069.html
for some related information.
/Mats
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 19 Mar 2009, at 00:41, Kees van den Doel wrote:
Aren't you using a synth with a vibrato channel then?
Of course. Not sure what you are thinking of with all these questions.
Point is that if I could generate MIDI messages in the score I could
do what I want.
Yes, I see that now. I was thinking of entering it in a musical way.
But it is good if one can have all sort of MIDI output tweaks - time
bends, too, for example, otherwise people may try to handle by writing
strange meters.
Hans
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
