>From your kind explanation would be right to say that the argument to
the LilyPond \char command is a simple natural number and not a
multibyte utf-8 sequence? This is what --I think-- still has to be
made clear.

2009/3/25 Hans Aberg <[email protected]>:
> You might search this page for "code point":
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode
>
> It just a natural number assign to each abstract character it defines. The
> section
>  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode#Architecture_and_terminology
> describes the convention of writing these numbers with the prefix "U+":
> numbers below 2^16 are written with four hex digit, and other with five or
> six as is needed.

...

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)

The incredible carnival of Badajoz
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pacovila/tags/carnaval/show/


_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to