On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:25:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 01:43:59PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > > > We *don't* have a response time of a week. Currently the only > > person who has shown the slightest bit of interest doing this job > > does it an average of once every two weeks. > > So the mechanism is not working out.
There are many parts of lilypond that are not working out; I don't see this as one of the most important ones. It might qualify as 4th or 5th. > > I do not agree with making the issue tracker open to everybody. > > We'll get tons of uninformed users posting non-bugs. > > So the idea of the current setup is actually to keep the number of users > posting bug reports down? We only want decent reports in the tracker, so as to not waste the limited programmer resources we have. I don't see this discussion going anywhere. - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
