On 6 February 2010 09:19, Dmytro O. Redchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> So, "just for tracking": since both issues marked as "Enhancement", i > believe it's quite safe to leave 999 unverified until 305 be closed. I might be wrong, but I think you're supposed to mark duplicates as verified if you agree they're duplicates. Now I've looked at this issue in a bit more detail, I think I was a bit hasty in marking it as a duplicate. I'll change it back and explain why on the tracker. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
