У сб, 2010-02-06 у 23:59 +0100, James Bailey пише: > On 06.02.2010, at 21:34, Graham Percival wrote: > > Also, please note that although **I'll** be advertising for more Bug > > Squadders, I don't want to train any volunteers myself. Instead, I > > want to pair newbies up with you three people. So the better you can > > make the CG chapter, the fewer questions you'll have to answer. :) > > (or at least, if somebody asks something that's covered in the CG, you > > can just point to the CG section rather than typing an answer from > > scratch) Actually, some guidance may be needed in any case (thank you for yours), at least like "yes, you've understood that right".
Now i try to remember what i _definitely could not_ find in CG... I guess it will be easier to remember if being asked ;) > > Oh, that reminded me: Dmytro, if there's any new bug reports, pick one > > and try adding it to the tracker. Read CG 7.2 in detail before you do > > that. I expect that you'll encounter a few problems, but this will be > > a good test of the CG on this topic. Well... I'd say everything is clear --- if i didn't any mistake... *If*, i mean. > And 7.6 Finding the cause of a regression may > be a job that a non-programmer can do, but it should be notated that > one needs to understand git, which most non-programmers are probably > not familiar with. Would be great to have this job explained in more details. I feel i can want to ask about this in some near future. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
