On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Neil Puttock <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 May 2010 19:51, Xavier Scheuer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> @Patrick: >> I think I will never agree with the choice of issue's priority, >> I would definitely set this one to "Priority-Medium" instead of >> "Priority-Low" as there is no trivial workaround here >> (apart from using manual beaming [ ] in each involved measure). >> Or maybe I'm wrong about this. > > I agree, but would go a bit further: this broke between 2.10 and 2.12, > so it should be classified as a critical regression.
Okay, thanks, I updated the issue. -Patrick _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
