On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk <[email protected]> wrote: > 1. "If the behaviour is expected, the user should be told to read the > documentation"... > > Isn't it a task for "Support" team? If i asked smth. like mentioned here in > bug-lilypond, i would consider as a quite normal answer "please ask this in > lilypond-user"
True. I've added a point to direct questions about program usage to lilypond-user. > 7.2 Issue classification > > So, i would propose to leave "The Bug Squad should classify issues according > to the guidelines given below" or like that. Ok, changed. I really just wanted to discourage more long discussions about the classification, but you're quite correct that it wasn't worded well. > 7.3 Adding issues to the tracker > > I would mention smth like "Added issue is always better then missed. We aware > of that fact that some issues may be "Invalid"; anyway in every case false > negatives are better then missed negatives. Done. I'll send an email when the updated guidelines are online. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
