Manual beaming

[Phil Holmes]

I _think_ I've found a bug in manual beaming.  See the snippet below and the 
image.  In the last example in the snippet, the beams end up higher than 
they should be.  This seems to be a consequence of having more than one note 
between the override Stem beaming commands, and not using 0 2 4 for the 
beamlet numbers.

<<
<<
\relative c'' {
 c32[ c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 1 2) (list 0 2 4))
      c c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 2 4) (list 0 1 4))
      c c c]
}

<<
\relative c'' {
 c32[ c c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 1 2) (list 0 3 4))
      c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 3 4) (list 0 1 2))
      c c c]
}

<<
\relative c'' {
 c32[ c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 1 2) (list 0 3 4))
      c c
      \once \override Stem
      #'beaming = #(cons (list 0 3 4) (list 0 1 2))
      c c c]
}




--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad

<<attachment: beam-manual-beaming.png>>_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond