On 31 July 2010 13:06, Reinhold Kainhofer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ahm, no, I don't think we want this before a clef change, because, here again, > the rest will collide with the clef. See attached file... But if there's no time signature on the left hand side, it will look weird. I can't see how we can accommodate every possibility (without significant changes to the break-alignment code), but changing the default to '(break-alignment . break-alignment) seems the best compromise, with overrides for the exceptions (i.e., issue 915). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
