On 9 August 2010 12:01, Dmytro O. Redchuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> As far as i can remember --- but i could not find this in archives!
> sorry --- i've asked the same thing some time ago, and was told that
> it's correct, because tempo was not changed.
>
> I still have no idea should this be considered as a bug or not.
>
> Let's wait for some more feedback?
>
> At least this may be an enhancement request (i can not see any way to
> control identical tempo appearance by the moment).
>
It is indeed maybe correct from a dev point of view...
But now as what user expects!
If I have one "Allegro" and then another "Allegro" I want *both* to
be printed! I don't care if the MIDI tempo is not changed.
Cheers,
Xavier
PS: As "enhancement request" I would suggest MetronomeMark (as well as
Metronome_mark_engraver) to be renamed into TempoMark, since it
should be now far more often used for textual tempo indications
than for metronome. But maybe I should wait for the GLISS to
suggest that?
PPS : It would also be cool if we could \override separately the
"textual tempo" and the metronome indication (to make them of
different size for instance). ;-)
--
Xavier Scheuer <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
