Comment #27 on issue 989 by [email protected]: ensure that no information
about 2.12.3 features is only in the regtests
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=989
?
All the reg tests were listed, and as I (and others) docced them the list
was reviewed by Phil who removed the reg tests from the wiki and left those
that needed to be done.
It was because no one was looking thoroughly through them that this tracker
item took so long to do. However I think Phil has done this and can only
say that waiting until 'someone' else does it is a waste of time. I mean,
what does it take to get a tracker item approved?
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
